Bob Cross Just Emailed Me This “It’s My Only Lithium Exposure…”

Bob Cross Standard Lithium

The age of the internal combustion engine is coming to a close. By 2030, China, the world’s largest auto market will likely end sales of all polluting vehicles. It already leads the world in the number of electric vehicles, ahead of both the EU and the US. By 2040, the United Kingdom and France will follow. California is already mulling a similar move. Even India has set a target to only sell electric cars by 2030.

It’s no surprise then that lithium demand is expected to reach near exponential growth rates over the next couple decades. By 2030, Bloomberg New Energy Finance predicts a more than thirtyfold increase in electric vehicles.

Electric Vehicles' Global Climb

Car manufacturers have been announcing plans to release electric vehicle models seemingly every couple weeks. In less than five years, it is estimated that 50 new electric car models will be introduced, bringing the total number to 136 pure electric models.

Green Wheels Standard Lithium

However, the global mismatch between lithium supply and demand continues. Driven by the electric vehicle revolution, lithium production is already lagging behind current demand. For instance, in its second quarter report in 2017, Tesla Motors blamed a battery shortage for the company not achieving its car delivery targets.

In October 2017, lithium prices have continued to surge. The Chinese spot price of lithium carbonate reached about $23,000 a ton, up 38% since the beginning of the year; it’s even an 18% increase compared to late August. As more and more news of electric vehicle mandates and pledges continue to roll in, it appears that lithium prices will remain very well supported.

As Bloomberg sums it up “We’re Going To Need More Lithium

The Investment Opportunity – Lithium Mining Companies

There is no doubt a huge investing opportunity here. While many people are focused on the ‘Big 3’: Albemarle, SQM, and FMC, which continue to dominate lithium production, there has also been a flood of junior mining and exploration companies entering the market.

Most investors would regard investing in one of the Big 3 lithium companies as the ideal lithium play. But Bob Cross isn’t your average investor. And as he says in the interview below, when it comes to lithium, he is invested in one and only one company – Standard Lithium (TSX-V:$SLL) (OTC:$STLHF) (FRA:$S5L).

What makes Standard Lithium stand out to Bob Cross? Read it in his own words first.

  1. Are you still long on Standard Lithium?

Yes, I own a significant position and I’ve participated at every financing level. It’s my only lithium exposure at the moment, for reasons listed below, and I believe this will be a big winner when the global M&A cycle in this sector unfolds. You will see a frenzy of strategic acquisitions by the battery makers and even the EV makers to secure lithium supplies, and I believe the valuations will shock people. SLL is perfectly positioned to benefit from this.

  1. If you are, what do you think about the California property and Smackover opportunity in Arkansas and what intrigued you to make such a big investment?

First of all, when you analyze the different methods and costs of mining Lithium, whether, from hard rock, clay, or extraction from brine, I’m 100% convinced that extracting lithium from brine using currently available extraction technologies (versus using evaporation ponds) will have the lowest production costs for the production of battery grade material. These technologies have been used in various forms in the mining business for other commodities for 50 years. Furthermore, these closed circuit extraction systems are very environmentally friendly, with a small footprint and minimal waste or tailings to deal with.

When surveying the current junior landscape of lithium players, and focussing specifically on the brine players, you have a choice between the Argentina/Chile brine companies that are focussed on the older evaporation pond methods, or companies like Standard Lithium. I backed SLL for the following reasons:

Management: I’ve known Robert Mintak and Andy Robinson for four years and I was an early investor in Pure Energy, their previous company with a brine project in Nevada. They are world leaders in understanding the currently available technologies that can efficiently extract lithium from brine to produce battery-grade Li hydroxide and have developed a global brain trust of technical advisors and suppliers over 5 years that is incomparable in my view.

Domestic Resources: I’ve been working internationally in the resource business for 25 years, and political risk is increasing everywhere. Standard Lithium’s strategy is to develop US-based resources, and I believe these resources will get a large premium when the M&A phase of this cycle begins. Any long-term strategic investor should think twice about making significant investments in Argentina or Chile.

Minimal Geological Risk: The California asset has known lithium concentrations from existing data. The brine is near the surface, Route 66 goes right through it only 2 1/2 hours drive from Las Vegas. The Smackover has well-understood geology and chemistry with significant existing brine production, re-injection and mineral/chemical extraction infrastructure.

Resource Size: Both assets have significant resource size potential.

Low Infrastructure Costs: Both assets have easy access to power, water, rail, and road transport. Compare this advantage to the infrastructure costs associated with the development of the Argentina deposits.

Low Permitting Risk: The deal that was done in California with National Chloride allows SLL to do initial work alongside a company with existing mining permits, and SLL also has access to private land to build the plant. A similar strategy will be used in the Smackover to limit permitting risk which often becomes the critical path with new mining developments.

Next US Producer: I believe that the combination of the above advantages will allow SLL to become the next lithium producer in the US because of the low risks and reduced timelines.

  1. Do you own any other lithium stock?



As you can see, Bob is very confident in his investment in what might appear to be, from the outside, a small and little known junior mining and exploration company. His confidence in Standard Lithium comes down to this:  Low Costs, Low Risks, and High Resources Equals Massive Potential.

Bob Cross foresees the upcoming M&A cycle in the lithium industry. As automakers and battery makers identify strategic lithium mining companies that can suit their future needs, we will be seeing as Bob puts it a “frenzy of strategic acquisitions”.

Already, we are seeing the early signs of this upcoming phase. Sinochem, China’s state chemical group, is looking to acquire a $4 billion stake in SQM. This was on the back of Tianqi Lithium, a Chinese producer, acquiring a $210 million stake in SQM in 2016. Great Wall Motors, a Chinese automobile manufacturer announced last month that it would be taking a $28 million stake in Australian miner Pilbara Minerals.

This is just the beginning of the cycle. As it intensifies with growing lithium demand, Bob Cross believes that Standard Lithium is uniquely positioned to benefit.

Low Costs

Standard Lithium’s low costs are driven by two things, location and process. Its current main focus, the 25,000-acre Bristol Dry Lake lithium project has a location that inherently gives it a cost advantage.

First, because of almost a century of historical mining in that location, much of the infrastructure is already in place. Electric power and water are already supplied to the property, while a major highway (Route 66) crosses its western and northern edges. Finally, the Burlington Northern Santa Fe railroad runs adjacent to the property.

Standard Lithium Map

Efficient processes also drive Standard Lithium’s low costs. Compared to hard rock mining, lithium brine is far more cost effective. However, the most common lithium brine extraction method in use today is through solar evaporation. Not only is it time consuming, taking approximately 12 months (not including construction), it is also not cost-efficient.

While Standard Lithium has currently constructed evaporation ponds for brine testing purposes, the company does not intend to use them as their primary extraction method. Instead, the company will use a combination of solar evaporation, membrane, chemical precipitation and selective lithium extraction technologies.

This new lithium extraction process would not only be more cost-efficient but also more environmentally friendly compared to solar evaporation. When coupled with the fact that the brines at the Bristol Lake project are mostly surface level, it’s clear that Standard Lithium will enjoy a processing cost advantage over other miners.

The extraction process was first developed by a company called Pure Energy Minerals, which was founded by the current CEO of Standard Lithium –Robert Mintak. The COO of Pure Energy Minerals, Dr. Andy Robinson, who was instrumental in developing the process, is currently the COO of Standard Lithium. And Bob Cross himself was a former advisor of Pure Energy Minerals, which explains his faith in the management team at Standard Lithium.

In addition to its own in-house world-class lithium brine process engineering team, Standard Lithium has also partnered with The University of British Columbia, global leader in process testing and development SGS, and world class material science and chemical engineering company Lilac Solutions. These partnerships are all geared toward perfecting the most optimal lithium extraction process through membrane/solvent extraction and ion exchange methods.

Low Risks

The main risk when it comes to investing in junior mining and exploration companies is that they have not entered production yet. Because of this, many such investments are risky prospects.

Standard Lithium’s risk mitigation is something that stands out to Bob Cross. The first is its location; the United States of America. Currently, most miners are looking to Argentina, where the ‘Lithium Triangle’ is located. All the big players have mining claims there.

But as Bob Cross sees it, resources are one thing, risk is another. He’s been in the game long enough to know that when it comes to mining natural resources, geopolitical risk is a factor. A big factor. Think nationalization of the oil industry. In fact, Argentina is one country with a nationalized oil industry; it just re-nationalized its state oil company in 2012 after privatizing it in 1993. As lithium becomes the ‘new gasoline’, we may see such familiar political disputes arise.

When the M&A phase goes into full swing, automakers and battery vehicles will be looking for lithium supplies that will be secure and stable over the long term. And as Bob Cross says, Standard Lithium’s strategy of focusing on US-based resources will definitely be a premium.

In addition to the low geopolitical risk, Bob also sees Standard Lithium as having low regulatory and geological risk. Standard Lithium’s deal with the National Chloride Company and its own private land mean a smooth regulatory path toward production. The company will replicate this strategy with its Smackover Formation resource.

As for geological risk, it’s almost negligible. The Bristol Lake project is already producing brine, so existing data already shows anomalous lithium concentrations. And the Smackover Formation has existing brine production and extraction infrastructure.

Lithium: Here for the Long Term

Many lithium companies, including Standard Lithium, have seen huge gains in their share prices in 2016 and 2017. So it’s tempting for some investors to want to cash out. But Bob Cross is obviously not one such investor. Fossil fuel powered vehicles are the present, but they are quickly becoming the past. Electric vehicles are here to stay, and so is lithium.

Despite some people warning of a ‘lithium bubble’, the facts show that this is only a myth. Not only is there no bubble, we are only in the beginning of the lithium boom.

Please See Disclaimer

  • Aaron

    Lithium is only the current battery tech. Other tech is on the way. Lithium won’t be around long.

  • Larry Bell

    I’m going to invest in all the new power plants that will need to be constructed to charge all new lithium battery powered cars and trucks.

  • jake rakestraw

    If electric is the future why did Warren Buffett’s Berkshire Hathaway Inc just buy almost 40% of Pilot Flying J (petro transportation and distribution) with plans to buy up to 80% by 2023?

With over five years of banking experience, Ian Lee provides high-level and well-researched financial content. He specializes in writing investment-based, informational pieces. Ian Lee attended the University of Texas, Austin from 2006 to 2010 and holds a Bachelor's of Business Administration.
IMPORTANT NOTICE AND DISCLAIMER: This stock profile should be viewed as a paid advertisement. The publisher, Coinbit Blockchain Solutions Inc., understands that in an effort to enhance public awareness of Standard Lithium Ltd. and its securities through the distribution of this advertisement. This Advertorial was paid for by Native Ads Inc., in an effort to enhance public awareness of Standard Lithium Ltd. and its securities. Coinbit Blockchain Solutions Inc. has or expects to receive eight thousand five hundred and seventy seven dollars and fifty seven cents by Native Ads Inc. All content, ad creatives and designs were previously approved by Standard Lithium Ltd. If successful, this advertisement will increase investor and market awareness, which may result in increased numbers of shareholders owning and trading the common stock of Standard Lithium Ltd., increased trading volumes, and possibly increased share price of the common stock of Standard Lithium Ltd. This publication is not, and should not be construed to be, an offer to sell or a solicitation of an offer to buy any security. This publication, its publisher, and its editor do not purport to provide a complete analysis of any company’s financial position. The publisher and editor are not, and do not purport to be, broker-dealers or registered investment advisors. Any investment should be made only after consulting a professional investment advisor and only after reviewing the financial statements and other pertinent corporate information about the company. Further, readers are advised to read and carefully consider the Risk Factors identified and discussed in the advertised company’s SEC filings. Investing in securities, particularly micro cap securities such as Standard Lithium Ltd., is speculative and carries a high degree of risk. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This publication is based exclusively on information generally available to the public and does not contain any material, non-public information. The information on which it is based is believed to be reliable. Nevertheless, the publisher cannot guarantee the accuracy or completeness of the information. The publisher conducts little or no due diligence on the profiles that are received by it’s advertisers. The information we disseminate about issuers contain forward looking statements, i.e. statements or discussions that constitute predictions, expectations, beliefs, plans, estimates, projections as indicated by such words as “expects”, “will”, “anticipates”, “estimates; therefore, you should proceed with extreme caution in relying upon such statements and conduct a full investigation into any such forward looking statements. Forward looking statements are limited to the time period in which they are made and we do not undertake to update forward looking statements that may change at anytime. The publisher notes that statements contained herein that look forward in time, which include everything other than historical information, involve risks and uncertainties that may affect the company’s actual results of operations. Factors that could cause actual results to differ include the size and growth of the market for the company’s products and services, the company’s ability to fund its capital requirements in the near term and long term and pricing pressures. Many of the penny stocks that are profiled or provide information have low trading volume, which may lead to difficulties in selling your securities. Many penny stocks profiled or provide information about are subject to intense competition, extreme regulatory oversight and inadequate financing to pursue their operational plan. The issuer profiles and information we provide represent only a small or even infinitesimal amount of information regarding the issuer and is insufficient to formulate an investment decision; as such, that information should only be a starting point from which you conduct an in-depth investigation of the issuer from available public sources, such as, www,,,, and other available public sources as well as consulting with your financial professional, investment adviser, registered representative with a registered securities broker-dealer. We urge you to conduct an in-depth investigation of the issuer from the above or other available sources, especially because we only present positive information, which is an insufficient basis to invest in any stock, yet alone a penny stock; accordingly, you should proceed with such investigation to determine, among other things, information pertaining to the issuer’s financial condition, operations, business model, and risks involved in the issuer’s business. The issuers we profile may have negative signs on the website (i.e. Stop Sign, No Information, Limited Information, Caveat Emptor), which you should determine from entering the symbol of the stock profiled into the website. You should determine whether the issuer we profile or provide information about is a development stage company, which is subject to the risks of a development stage company in a similar such business, including difficulties in obtaining financing for operations and future growth. You should conduct an investigation of the innumerable risks that are inherent or present in the business plan of almost any penny stock issuer; therefore, do not use our profiles or any information contained in our website or profiles as the sole determination of making an investment decision. We only present positive information regarding an issuer; therefore, you should conduct an in-depth investigation of any possible negative factors regarding such issuer. You should accept our information in an “as is” state; in other words, your use of the information is at your own risk and such information may change at anytime and it is not based upon any verification or due diligence of the statements made. Directors, Officers, employees or members of their immediate families are prohibited from making purchases and/or sales of those securities in the open market or otherwise from the time of the interview or the decision to write an article, until one week after the publication of the interview or article. Coinbit Blockchain Solutions Inc. and other trademarks and copyrights used in this publication are the property of their respective trademark and copyright holders. Coinbit Blockchain Solutions Inc. is not affiliated, connected, or associated with, and are not sponsored, approved, or originated by, the trademark holders unless otherwise stated. No claim is made by Coinbit Blockchain Solutions Inc. any third-party trademarks or copyrights.