The Meta Privacy Case marks a significant victory for privacy advocates and underscores the growing scrutiny over how social media companies handle personal data. The European Union’s top court has ruled that Meta Platforms, Inc. (NASDAQ:META) cannot use personal information, such as sexual orientation obtained outside its platforms, for personalized advertising under the bloc’s strict General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR).

A Win for Privacy Advocate Max Schrems

Austrian privacy activist Max Schrems emerged victorious as the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) upheld a ruling limiting how Meta can collect and use external data. Schrems, a long-time critic of the data policies of major tech companies, argued that Meta, the parent company of Facebook, violated GDPR rules by using sensitive data to target ads without explicit user consent.

The case originated when Schrems discovered that Facebook had used information about his sexual orientation to deliver targeted ads. This information was obtained from a panel discussion where Schrems had openly shared his orientation, not through any details shared directly on his Facebook profile. Schrems argued that this amounted to an inappropriate use of personal data for advertising purposes.

GDPR Limits Data Collection and Targeting

Under GDPR, companies operating within the EU are expected to adhere to strict data privacy rules, emphasizing principles like “data minimization.” This means data collection should be limited to what is necessary for the intended purpose and should not be overly expansive. Schrems contended that Meta’s actions violated these principles, as the company aggregated and analyzed data beyond what users willingly provided on the platform.

In its decision, the CJEU ruled in favor of Schrems, stating that social media networks like Facebook are not authorized to use all personal data obtained from external sources without restrictions. The court further clarified that even if a user shares certain information in a public forum outside the platform, it does not grant the social network the right to process this data for personalized advertising.

Impact on Meta’s Advertising Practices

This ruling has broad implications for how Meta and similar platforms operate within the EU. According to Schrems’ lawyer, Katharina Raabe-Stuppnig, Meta’s longstanding practice of building a vast data pool on users, including information gathered externally, is now subject to more stringent limitations. “Following this ruling, only a small part of Meta’s data pool will be allowed to be used for advertising — even when users consent to ads,” Raabe-Stuppnig said.

Meta, for its part, expressed that it is awaiting the publication of the court’s full judgment and emphasized its commitment to privacy. “Everyone using Facebook has access to a wide range of settings and tools that allow people to manage how we use their information,” the company stated.

The Larger Battle Over Data Privacy

The Meta Privacy Case highlights the tension between the business models of tech giants like Meta and the growing demand for data privacy and user control. Social media companies often rely on targeted advertising to drive revenue, leveraging user data to deliver personalized ads. However, privacy advocates argue that this data use often crosses ethical and legal lines, especially when it involves sensitive information such as sexual orientation, health, or political beliefs.

Schrems’ victory is part of a broader trend in Europe, where courts and regulators are increasingly willing to challenge the practices of major tech companies. The decision reinforces the principles laid out in the GDPR, which has become a global standard for privacy laws and has inspired similar regulations around the world.

A Roadmap for Future Data Practices

The ruling in this Meta Privacy Case sets a significant precedent for how social media networks collect and process user data. It restricts the extent to which Meta can utilize external data for targeted ads, ensuring that users have greater control over their personal information. This decision is likely to influence how Meta and other tech giants approach data privacy, not only within the EU but globally, as they adapt their policies to meet GDPR standards.

For consumers, this case serves as a reminder of their rights under GDPR and the importance of understanding how their data is being used. For businesses, it acts as a call to align their data practices with regulations and uphold transparency in how personal information is processed for advertising purposes.

Featured Image: Unsplash

Please See Disclaimer